[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2df6f002-dcf8-1073-d0b5-a9843103096a@collabora.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2023 23:36:59 +0300
From: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@...labora.com>
To: Benjamin Bara <bbara93@...il.com>, Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>,
Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com
Cc: peterz@...radead.org, jonathanh@...dia.com,
richard.leitner@...ux.dev, treding@...dia.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
Benjamin Bara <benjamin.bara@...data.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] mfd: tps6586x: use devm-based power off handler
On 4/13/23 10:46, Benjamin Bara wrote:
> +static int tps6586x_power_off_handler(struct sys_off_data *data)
> {
> - if (tps6586x_clr_bits(tps6586x_dev, TPS6586X_SUPPLYENE, EXITSLREQ_BIT))
> - return;
> + struct device *tps6586x_dev = data->cb_data;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = tps6586x_clr_bits(tps6586x_dev, TPS6586X_SUPPLYENE, EXITSLREQ_BIT);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
>
> - tps6586x_set_bits(tps6586x_dev, TPS6586X_SUPPLYENE, SLEEP_MODE_BIT);
> + return tps6586x_set_bits(tps6586x_dev, TPS6586X_SUPPLYENE, SLEEP_MODE_BIT);
Handlers must return NOTIFY_DONE or notifier_from_errno(). Sorry for
missing this previously.
--
Best regards,
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists