[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2c5d4e9b-ec7d-dbfc-7e95-e75b66b68d3c@linux.dev>
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2023 11:23:21 +0800
From: Chengming Zhou <chengming.zhou@...ux.dev>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: axboe@...nel.dk, josef@...icpanda.com, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@...edance.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] blk-stat: fix QUEUE_FLAG_STATS clear
On 2023/4/13 01:12, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 12:07:53AM +0800, chengming.zhou@...ux.dev wrote:
>> From: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@...edance.com>
>>
>> We need to set QUEUE_FLAG_STATS for two cases:
>> 1. blk_stat_enable_accounting()
>> 2. blk_stat_add_callback()
>>
>> So we should clear it only when ((q->stats->accounting == 0) &&
>> list_empty(&q->stats->callbacks)).
>>
>> blk_stat_disable_accounting() only check if q->stats->accounting
>> is 0 before clear the flag, this patch fix it.
>>
>> Also add list_empty(&q->stats->callbacks)) check when enable, or
>> the flag is already set.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@...edance.com>
>
> Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
>
> It'd be useful to explicitly illustrate the buggy behavior in the
> description (e.g. if you do X, Y and then Z, then X incorrectly loses
Yes, I will add below buggy behavior in the next version:
This bug can be reproduced as below on kernel without BLK_DEV_THROTTLING
(since it will unconditionally enable accounting, see the second patch).
# cat /sys/block/sr0/queue/scheduler
none mq-deadline [bfq]
# cat /sys/kernel/debug/block/sr0/state
SAME_COMP|IO_STAT|INIT_DONE|STATS|REGISTERED|NOWAIT|30
# echo none > /sys/block/sr0/queue/scheduler
# cat /sys/kernel/debug/block/sr0/state
SAME_COMP|IO_STAT|INIT_DONE|REGISTERED|NOWAIT
# cat /sys/block/sr0/queue/wbt_lat_usec
75000
We can see that after changing elevator from "bfq" to "none", "STATS" flag
is lost even though WBT callback still need it.
> accounting). Can you also please add the appropriate stable cc?
Ok, will do.
Thanks.
>
> Thanks.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists