[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230412204414.72e89e5b@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 20:44:14 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: "Radu Pirea (OSS)" <radu-nicolae.pirea@....nxp.com>
Cc: andrew@...n.ch, hkallweit1@...il.com, linux@...linux.org.uk,
davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: phy: nxp-c45-tja11xx: fix the PTP interrupt
enabling/disabling
On Mon, 10 Apr 2023 15:48:56 +0300 Radu Pirea (OSS) wrote:
> - if (phydev->interrupts == PHY_INTERRUPT_ENABLED)
> + if (phydev->interrupts == PHY_INTERRUPT_ENABLED) {
> + phy_set_bits_mmd(phydev, MDIO_MMD_VEND1, PTP_IRQS, PTP_IRQS);
Isn't the third argument supposed to be the address?
Am I missing something or this patch was no tested properly?
Also why ignore the return value?
> return phy_set_bits_mmd(phydev, MDIO_MMD_VEND1,
> VEND1_PHY_IRQ_EN, PHY_IRQ_LINK_EVENT);
> - else
> + } else {
> + phy_clear_bits_mmd(phydev, MDIO_MMD_VEND1, PTP_IRQS, PTP_IRQS);
> return phy_clear_bits_mmd(phydev, MDIO_MMD_VEND1,
> VEND1_PHY_IRQ_EN, PHY_IRQ_LINK_EVENT);
> + }
Powered by blists - more mailing lists