[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230413005129.GZ3390869@ZenIV>
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2023 01:51:29 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@...cle.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 01/18] net: Declare MSG_SPLICE_PAGES internal
sendmsg() flag
On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 05:08:45PM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> @@ -2483,6 +2484,7 @@ static int ____sys_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg_sys,
> }
> msg_sys->msg_flags = flags;
>
> + flags &= ~MSG_INTERNAL_SENDMSG_FLAGS;
> if (sock->file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK)
> msg_sys->msg_flags |= MSG_DONTWAIT;
A bit too late, innit? There's no users of 'flags' downstream of that
assignment to ->msg_flags, so your &= is a no-op; it should be done
*before* that assignment...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists