[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230413080822.GH4253@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2023 10:08:22 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/9] objtool: Add verbose option for disassembling
affected functions
On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 12:03:20PM -0700, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> + objdump_str = "%sobjdump -wdr %s | gawk -M -v _funcs='%s' '"
> + "BEGIN { split(_funcs, funcs); }"
> + "/^$/ { func_match = 0; }"
> + "/<.*>:/ { "
> + "f = gensub(/.*<(.*)>:/, \"\\\\1\", 1);"
> + "for (i in funcs) {"
> + "if (funcs[i] == f) {"
> + "func_match = 1;"
> + "base = strtonum(\"0x\" $1);"
> + "break;"
> + "}"
> + "}"
> + "}"
> + "{"
> + "if (func_match) {"
> + "addr = strtonum(\"0x\" $1);"
> + "printf(\"%%04x \", addr - base);"
> + "print;"
> + "}"
> + "}' 1>&2";
Do we want to have scripts/objdump-func.awk and use that to avoid the
duplication and eventual divergence of these awk thingies?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists