[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87ile0qf25.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk>
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2023 11:58:26 +0200
From: Peter Korsgaard <peter@...sgaard.com>
To: Matthias Schiffer <matthias.schiffer@...tq-group.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@...n.ch>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux@...tq-group.com,
Gregor Herburger <gregor.herburger@...group.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] i2c: ocores: generate stop condition after timeout
in polling mode
>>>>> "Matthias" == Matthias Schiffer <matthias.schiffer@...tq-group.com> writes:
> From: Gregor Herburger <gregor.herburger@...group.com>
> In polling mode, no stop condition is generated after a timeout. This
> causes SCL to remain low and thereby block the bus. If this happens
> during a transfer it can cause slaves to misinterpret the subsequent
> transfer and return wrong values.
> To solve this, pass the ETIMEDOUT error up from ocores_process_polling()
> instead of setting STATE_ERROR directly. The caller is adjusted to call
> ocores_process_timeout() on error both in polling and in IRQ mode, which
> will set STATE_ERROR and generate a stop condition.
> Fixes: 69c8c0c0efa8 ("i2c: ocores: add polling interface")
> Signed-off-by: Gregor Herburger <gregor.herburger@...group.com>
> Signed-off-by: Matthias Schiffer <matthias.schiffer@...tq-group.com>
> ---
> v2: style improvements based on feedback from Federico and Andrew. I went
> with a slightly different solution than Andrew suggested to avoid using
> the ret variable for two different kinds of returns.
Acked-by: Peter Korsgaard <peter@...sgaard.com>
--
Bye, Peter Korsgaard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists