[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cdf60454-c026-def4-b582-0ff894f98acf@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2023 09:49:53 +0800
From: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Xiaofei Tan <tanxiaofei@...wei.com>, mawupeng1@...wei.com,
tony.luck@...el.com, naoya.horiguchi@....com
Cc: linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, justin.he@....com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, ardb@...nel.org, ashish.kalra@....com,
baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com, bp@...en8.de,
cuibixuan@...ux.alibaba.com, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
james.morse@....com, jarkko@...nel.org, lenb@...nel.org,
linmiaohe@...wei.com, lvying6@...wei.com, rafael@...nel.org,
xiexiuqi@...wei.com, zhuo.song@...ux.alibaba.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] ACPI: APEI: handle synchronous exceptions in task
work
On 2023/4/12 PM12:05, Xiaofei Tan wrote:
>
> 在 2023/4/11 18:48, Shuai Xue 写道:
>> Hardware errors could be signaled by synchronous interrupt, e.g. when an
>> error is detected by a background scrubber, or signaled by synchronous
>> exception, e.g. when an uncorrected error is consumed. Both synchronous and
>> asynchronous error are queued and handled by a dedicated kthread in
>> workqueue.
>>
>> commit 7f17b4a121d0 ("ACPI: APEI: Kick the memory_failure() queue for
>> synchronous errors") keep track of whether memory_failure() work was
>> queued, and make task_work pending to flush out the workqueue so that the
>> work for synchronous error is processed before returning to user-space.
>> The trick ensures that the corrupted page is unmapped and poisoned. And
>> after returning to user-space, the task starts at current instruction which
>> triggering a page fault in which kernel will send SIGBUS to current process
>> due to VM_FAULT_HWPOISON.
>>
>> However, the memory failure recovery for hwpoison-aware mechanisms does not
>> work as expected. For example, hwpoison-aware user-space processes like
>> QEMU register their customized SIGBUS handler and enable early kill mode by
>> seting PF_MCE_EARLY at initialization. Then the kernel will directy notify
>> the process by sending a SIGBUS signal in memory failure with wrong
>> si_code: the actual user-space process accessing the corrupt memory
>> location, but its memory failure work is handled in a kthread context, so
>> it will send SIGBUS with BUS_MCEERR_AO si_code to the actual user-space
>> process instead of BUS_MCEERR_AR in kill_proc().
>>
>> To this end, separate synchronous and asynchronous error handling into
>> different paths like X86 platform does:
>>
>> - valid synchronous errors: queue a task_work to synchronously send SIGBUS
>> before ret_to_user.
>> - valid asynchronous errors: queue a work into workqueue to asynchronously
>> handle memory failure.
>> - abnormal branches such as invalid PA, unexpected severity, no memory
>> failure config support, invalid GUID section, OOM, etc.
>>
>> Then for valid synchronous errors, the current context in memory failure is
>> exactly belongs to the task consuming poison data and it will send SIBBUS
>> with proper si_code.
>>
>> Fixes: 7f17b4a121d0 ("ACPI: APEI: Kick the memory_failure() queue for synchronous errors")
>> Signed-off-by: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@...ux.alibaba.com>
>> Tested-by: Ma Wupeng <mawupeng1@...wei.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c | 91 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>> include/acpi/ghes.h | 3 --
>> mm/memory-failure.c | 13 ------
>> 3 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
>> index c479b85899f5..4b70955e25f9 100644
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
>> @@ -452,28 +452,51 @@ static void ghes_clear_estatus(struct ghes *ghes,
>> }
>> /*
>> - * Called as task_work before returning to user-space.
>> - * Ensure any queued work has been done before we return to the context that
>> - * triggered the notification.
>> + * struct sync_task_work - for synchronous RAS event
>> + *
>> + * @twork: callback_head for task work
>> + * @pfn: page frame number of corrupted page
>> + * @flags: fine tune action taken
>> + *
>> + * Structure to pass task work to be handled before
>> + * ret_to_user via task_work_add().
>> */
>> -static void ghes_kick_task_work(struct callback_head *head)
>> +struct sync_task_work {
>> + struct callback_head twork;
>> + u64 pfn;
>> + int flags;
>> +};
>> +
>> +static void memory_failure_cb(struct callback_head *twork)
>> {
>> - struct acpi_hest_generic_status *estatus;
>> - struct ghes_estatus_node *estatus_node;
>> - u32 node_len;
>> + int ret;
>> + struct sync_task_work *twcb =
>> + container_of(twork, struct sync_task_work, twork);
>> - estatus_node = container_of(head, struct ghes_estatus_node, task_work);
>> - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_MEMORY_FAILURE))
>> - memory_failure_queue_kick(estatus_node->task_work_cpu);
>> + ret = memory_failure(twcb->pfn, twcb->flags);
>> + kfree(twcb);
>> - estatus = GHES_ESTATUS_FROM_NODE(estatus_node);
>> - node_len = GHES_ESTATUS_NODE_LEN(cper_estatus_len(estatus));
>> - gen_pool_free(ghes_estatus_pool, (unsigned long)estatus_node, node_len);
>> + if (!ret)
>> + return;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * -EHWPOISON from memory_failure() means that it already sent SIGBUS
>> + * to the current process with the proper error info,
>> + * -EOPNOTSUPP means hwpoison_filter() filtered the error event,
>> + *
>> + * In both cases, no further processing is required.
>> + */
>> + if (ret == -EHWPOISON || ret == -EOPNOTSUPP)
>> + return;
>> +
>> + pr_err("Memory error not recovered");
>
> The print could add the following SIGBUS signal sending.
> Such as "Sending SIGBUS to current task due to memory error not recovered"
>
>> + force_sig(SIGBUS);
>> }
>> static bool ghes_do_memory_failure(u64 physical_addr, int flags)
>> {
>> unsigned long pfn;
>> + struct sync_task_work *twcb;
>> if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_MEMORY_FAILURE))
>> return false;
>> @@ -486,6 +509,18 @@ static bool ghes_do_memory_failure(u64 physical_addr, int flags)
>> return false;
>> }
>> + if (flags == MF_ACTION_REQUIRED && current->mm) {
>> + twcb = kmalloc(sizeof(*twcb), GFP_ATOMIC);
>> + if (!twcb)
>> + return false;
>> +
>> + twcb->pfn = pfn;
>> + twcb->flags = flags;
>> + init_task_work(&twcb->twork, memory_failure_cb);
>> + task_work_add(current, &twcb->twork, TWA_RESUME);
>> + return true;
>> + }
>> +
>> memory_failure_queue(pfn, flags);
>> return true;
>> }
>> @@ -1000,9 +1035,8 @@ static void ghes_proc_in_irq(struct irq_work *irq_work)
>> struct ghes_estatus_node *estatus_node;
>> struct acpi_hest_generic *generic;
>> struct acpi_hest_generic_status *estatus;
>> - bool task_work_pending;
>> + bool queued, sync;
>> u32 len, node_len;
>> - int ret;
>> llnode = llist_del_all(&ghes_estatus_llist);
>> /*
>> @@ -1015,27 +1049,25 @@ static void ghes_proc_in_irq(struct irq_work *irq_work)
>> estatus_node = llist_entry(llnode, struct ghes_estatus_node,
>> llnode);
>> estatus = GHES_ESTATUS_FROM_NODE(estatus_node);
>> + sync = is_hest_sync_notify(estatus_node->ghes);
>> len = cper_estatus_len(estatus);
>> node_len = GHES_ESTATUS_NODE_LEN(len);
>> - task_work_pending = ghes_do_proc(estatus_node->ghes, estatus);
>> +
>> + queued = ghes_do_proc(estatus_node->ghes, estatus);
>> + /*
>> + * If no memory failure work is queued for abnormal synchronous
>> + * errors, do a force kill.
>> + */
>> + if (sync && !queued)
>> + force_sig(SIGBUS);
>
> Could also add one similar print here as above
> Apart from this,
> Reviewed-by: Xiaofei Tan <tanxiaofei@...wei.com>
Thanks :)
Sorry, I missed your replies, because Thunderbird marks an email as Junk,
just move it to the Junk folder.
I'd like to add above warning message and pick up your reviewed-by tag.
Cheers,
Shuai
>
>> +
>> if (!ghes_estatus_cached(estatus)) {
>> generic = estatus_node->generic;
>> if (ghes_print_estatus(NULL, generic, estatus))
>> ghes_estatus_cache_add(generic, estatus);
>> }
>> -
>> - if (task_work_pending && current->mm) {
>> - estatus_node->task_work.func = ghes_kick_task_work;
>> - estatus_node->task_work_cpu = smp_processor_id();
>> - ret = task_work_add(current, &estatus_node->task_work,
>> - TWA_RESUME);
>> - if (ret)
>> - estatus_node->task_work.func = NULL;
>> - }
>> -
>> - if (!estatus_node->task_work.func)
>> - gen_pool_free(ghes_estatus_pool,
>> - (unsigned long)estatus_node, node_len);
>> + gen_pool_free(ghes_estatus_pool, (unsigned long)estatus_node,
>> + node_len);
>> llnode = next;
>> }
>> @@ -1096,7 +1128,6 @@ static int ghes_in_nmi_queue_one_entry(struct ghes *ghes,
>> estatus_node->ghes = ghes;
>> estatus_node->generic = ghes->generic;
>> - estatus_node->task_work.func = NULL;
>> estatus = GHES_ESTATUS_FROM_NODE(estatus_node);
>> if (__ghes_read_estatus(estatus, buf_paddr, fixmap_idx, len)) {
>> diff --git a/include/acpi/ghes.h b/include/acpi/ghes.h
>> index 3c8bba9f1114..e5e0c308d27f 100644
>> --- a/include/acpi/ghes.h
>> +++ b/include/acpi/ghes.h
>> @@ -35,9 +35,6 @@ struct ghes_estatus_node {
>> struct llist_node llnode;
>> struct acpi_hest_generic *generic;
>> struct ghes *ghes;
>> -
>> - int task_work_cpu;
>> - struct callback_head task_work;
>> };
>> struct ghes_estatus_cache {
>> diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
>> index fae9baf3be16..6ea8c325acb3 100644
>> --- a/mm/memory-failure.c
>> +++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
>> @@ -2355,19 +2355,6 @@ static void memory_failure_work_func(struct work_struct *work)
>> }
>> }
>> -/*
>> - * Process memory_failure work queued on the specified CPU.
>> - * Used to avoid return-to-userspace racing with the memory_failure workqueue.
>> - */
>> -void memory_failure_queue_kick(int cpu)
>> -{
>> - struct memory_failure_cpu *mf_cpu;
>> -
>> - mf_cpu = &per_cpu(memory_failure_cpu, cpu);
>> - cancel_work_sync(&mf_cpu->work);
>> - memory_failure_work_func(&mf_cpu->work);
>> -}
>> -
>> static int __init memory_failure_init(void)
>> {
>> struct memory_failure_cpu *mf_cpu;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists