[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230412215557.05df918e@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 21:55:57 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>
Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@...edance.com>,
"Zhang, Qiang1" <qiang1.zhang@...el.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
"42.hyeyoo@...il.com" <42.hyeyoo@...il.com>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"roman.gushchin@...ux.dev" <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
"iamjoonsoo.kim@....com" <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
"rientjes@...gle.com" <rientjes@...gle.com>,
"penberg@...nel.org" <penberg@...nel.org>,
"cl@...ux.com" <cl@...ux.com>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Zhao Gongyi <zhaogongyi@...edance.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
RCU <rcu@...r.kernel.org>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: slub: annotate kmem_cache_node->list_lock as
raw_spinlock
On Wed, 12 Apr 2023 20:24:19 -0400
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org> wrote:
> I think it would be better to fix PROVE_LOCKING / CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT
> instead of degrading !CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT just to satisfy a
> false-positive report.
I think getting Peter's patch working:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230412124735.GE628377@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net/
is the real solution.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists