linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next V2 0/2] virtio-net: don't busy poll for cvq command

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <12865759-344a-9111-0ceb-6a31ac510426@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu, 13 Apr 2023 15:05:48 +0200
From:   Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@...hat.com>
To:     Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>, mst@...hat.com
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
        pabeni@...hat.com, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, alvaro.karsz@...id-run.com,
        eperezma@...hat.com, xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com,
        david.marchand@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next V2 0/2] virtio-net: don't busy poll for cvq
 command



On 4/13/23 15:02, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
> Hi Jason,
> 
> On 4/13/23 08:40, Jason Wang wrote:
>> Hi all:
>>
>> The code used to busy poll for cvq command which turns out to have
>> several side effects:
>>
>> 1) infinite poll for buggy devices
>> 2) bad interaction with scheduler
>>
>> So this series tries to use sleep instead of busy polling. In this
>> version, I take a step back: the hardening part is not implemented and
>> leave for future investigation. We use to aggree to use interruptible
>> sleep but it doesn't work for a general workqueue.
>>
>> Please review.
> 
> Thanks for working on this.
> My DPDK VDUSE RFC missed to set the interrupt, as Xuan Zhou highlighted
> it makes the vdpa dev add/del commands to freeze:
> [<0>] device_del+0x37/0x3d0
> [<0>] device_unregister+0x13/0x60
> [<0>] unregister_virtio_device+0x11/0x20
> [<0>] device_release_driver_internal+0x193/0x200
> [<0>] bus_remove_device+0xbf/0x130
> [<0>] device_del+0x174/0x3d0
> [<0>] device_unregister+0x13/0x60
> [<0>] vdpa_nl_cmd_dev_del_set_doit+0x66/0xe0 [vdpa]
> [<0>] genl_family_rcv_msg_doit.isra.0+0xb8/0x100
> [<0>] genl_rcv_msg+0x151/0x290
> [<0>] netlink_rcv_skb+0x54/0x100
> [<0>] genl_rcv+0x24/0x40
> [<0>] netlink_unicast+0x217/0x340
> [<0>] netlink_sendmsg+0x23e/0x4a0
> [<0>] sock_sendmsg+0x8f/0xa0
> [<0>] __sys_sendto+0xfc/0x170
> [<0>] __x64_sys_sendto+0x20/0x30
> [<0>] do_syscall_64+0x59/0x90
> [<0>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x72/0xdc
> 
> Once fixed on DPDK side (you can use my vduse_v1 branch [0] for
> testing), it works fine:
> 
> Tested-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@...hat.com>
> 
> For the potential missing interrupt with non-compliant devices, I guess
> it could be handled with the hardening work as same thing could happen
> if the VDUSE application crashed for example.
> 
> Regards,
> Maxime
> 
> [0]:

Better with the link...

[0]: https://gitlab.com/mcoquelin/dpdk-next-virtio/-/commits/vduse_v1/

>> Thanks
>>
>> Changes since V1:
>> - use RTNL to synchronize rx mode worker
>> - use completion for simplicity
>> - don't try to harden CVQ command
>>
>> Changes since RFC:
>>
>> - switch to use BAD_RING in virtio_break_device()
>> - check virtqueue_is_broken() after being woken up
>> - use more_used() instead of virtqueue_get_buf() to allow caller to
>>    get buffers afterwards
>>    - break the virtio-net device when timeout
>>    - get buffer manually since the virtio core check more_used() instead
>>
>> Jason Wang (2):
>>    virtio-net: convert rx mode setting to use workqueue
>>    virtio-net: sleep instead of busy waiting for cvq command
>>
>>   drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>>   1 file changed, 66 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>