linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6.2 000/173] 6.2.11-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <8DA42803-580A-41F6-B80F-45AE269EC38D@sladewatkins.net>
Date:   Wed, 12 Apr 2023 22:18:40 -0400
From:   Slade Watkins <srw@...dewatkins.net>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
        patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
        jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
        sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, rwarsow@....de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.2 000/173] 6.2.11-rc1 review


> On Apr 12, 2023, at 4:32 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> 
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.2.11 release.
> There are 173 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Fri, 14 Apr 2023 08:28:02 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.2.11-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.2.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h


Compiled & booted on two of my x86_64 test systems, no errors or regressions.

Tested-by: Slade Watkins <srw@...dewatkins.net>

Slade