linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v2 2/2] dt-bindings: usb: snps,dwc3: Add 'snps,global-regs-starting-offset' quirk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 13 Apr 2023 14:58:01 +0000
From:   Stanley Chang[昌育德] 
        <stanley_chang@...ltek.com>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
        Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen@...opsys.com>
CC:     "linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 2/2] dt-bindings: usb: snps,dwc3: Add 'snps,global-regs-starting-offset' quirk

> On 13/04/2023 06:25, Stanley Chang wrote:
> > Add a new 'snps,global-regs-starting-offset' DT to dwc3 core to remap
> > the global register start address
> >
> > The RTK DHC SoCs were designed the global register address offset at
> > 0x8100. The default address is at DWC3_GLOBALS_REGS_START (0xc100).
> > Therefore, add the property of device-tree to adjust this start address.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stanley Chang <stanley_chang@...ltek.com>
> > ---
> >  v1 to v2 change:
> > 1. Change the name of the property "snps,global-regs-starting-offset".
> > ---
> 
> Didn't you got already comment for this patch? How did you implement it?
> 
> Also, I asked you multiple times:
> 
> Please use scripts/get_maintainers.pl to get a list of necessary people and lists
> to CC.  It might happen, that command when run on an older kernel, gives
> you outdated entries.  Therefore please be sure you base your patches on
> recent Linux kernel.
> 
> I don't understand why you ignore this.
> 
> NAK, patch is not correct.
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
> 

Thank you for your patient guidance.
Because I'm not familiar with the review process and didn't use scripts/get_maintainers.pl properly in the initial email thread.
Therefore, this series of errors was caused. Sorry for the confusion.
Now I know how to use the script properly.
After correcting the maintainer's suggestion, I'll restart a new email thread and review again.