linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: leds: Add ROHM BD2606MVV LED driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7fe8d6f5-ab0f-c6d5-2551-7beb3dfb16d7@linaro.org>
Date:   Fri, 14 Apr 2023 23:17:56 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Andreas Kemnade <andreas@...nade.info>
Cc:     pavel@....cz, lee@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: leds: Add ROHM BD2606MVV LED driver

On 14/04/2023 17:54, Andreas Kemnade wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Apr 2023 17:28:49 +0200
> Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
> 
>> On 14/04/2023 07:53, Andreas Kemnade wrote:
>>> Document ROHM BD2606MVV LED driver devicetree bindings.  
>>
>> Subject: no improvements and no comments from your side. Why?
>>
> old subject (v2):
> 
> dt-bindings: leds: ROHM BD2606MVV LED driver
> 
> Your comment:
> Subject: maybe drop "driver" (suggests it is for Linux drivers, although
> maybe it matches the actual hardware here?) and add missing verb, e.g.
> "Add ROHM ..."
> 
> New Subject (v3/4):
> dt-bindings: leds: Add ROHM BD2606MVV LED driver
> 
> What is still missing?

There is still "driver". Comment was: drop "driver". Where is it dropped?

If you do not agree, sure, just respond with something.

Best regards,
Krzysztof