linux-kernel - [patch 17/37] x86/xen/hvm: Get rid of DEAD

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230414232310.256412375@linutronix.de>
Date:   Sat, 15 Apr 2023 01:44:41 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     x86@...nel.org, David Woodhouse <dwmw@...radead.org>,
        Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>,
        Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
        "Arjan van de Veen" <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Paul McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>,
        Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@...alenko.name>,
        Paul Menzel <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de>,
        "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@...lia.com>,
        Piotr Gorski <lucjan.lucjanov@...il.com>,
        Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
        Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
        xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>,
        Usama Arif <usama.arif@...edance.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>,
        linux-csky@...r.kernel.org,
        Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
        linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
        "James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
        Helge Deller <deller@....de>, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
        linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Sabin Rapan <sabrapan@...zon.com>
Subject: [patch 17/37] x86/xen/hvm: Get rid of DEAD_FROZEN handling

No point in this conditional voodoo. Un-initializing the lock mechanism is
safe to be called unconditionally even if it was already invoked when the
CPU died.

Remove the invocation of xen_smp_intr_free() as that has been already
cleaned up in xen_cpu_dead_hvm().

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
Cc: xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org
---
 arch/x86/xen/enlighten_hvm.c |   11 +++++------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten_hvm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten_hvm.c
@@ -161,13 +161,12 @@ static int xen_cpu_up_prepare_hvm(unsign
 	int rc = 0;
 
 	/*
-	 * This can happen if CPU was offlined earlier and
-	 * offlining timed out in common_cpu_die().
+	 * If a CPU was offlined earlier and offlining timed out then the
+	 * lock mechanism is still initialized. Uninit it unconditionally
+	 * as it's safe to call even if already uninited. Interrupts and
+	 * timer have already been handled in xen_cpu_dead_hvm().
 	 */
-	if (cpu_report_state(cpu) == CPU_DEAD_FROZEN) {
-		xen_smp_intr_free(cpu);
-		xen_uninit_lock_cpu(cpu);
-	}
+	xen_uninit_lock_cpu(cpu);
 
 	if (cpu_acpi_id(cpu) != U32_MAX)
 		per_cpu(xen_vcpu_id, cpu) = cpu_acpi_id(cpu);