[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACGkMEtgrxN3PPwsDo4oOsnsSLJfEmBEZ0WvjGRr3whU+QasUg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2023 12:53:58 +0800
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: mst@...hat.com, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
pabeni@...hat.com, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, maxime.coquelin@...hat.com,
alvaro.karsz@...id-run.com, eperezma@...hat.com,
xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com, david.marchand@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next V2 0/2] virtio-net: don't busy poll for cvq command
On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 10:04 PM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 13 Apr 2023 14:40:25 +0800 Jason Wang wrote:
> > The code used to busy poll for cvq command which turns out to have
> > several side effects:
> >
> > 1) infinite poll for buggy devices
> > 2) bad interaction with scheduler
> >
> > So this series tries to use sleep instead of busy polling. In this
> > version, I take a step back: the hardening part is not implemented and
> > leave for future investigation. We use to aggree to use interruptible
> > sleep but it doesn't work for a general workqueue.
>
> CC: netdev missing?
My bad. Will cc netdev for any discussion.
Thanks
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists