linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] dt-bindings: input: touchscreen: add bindings for focaltech,fts5452

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 14 Apr 2023 09:44:10 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Joel Selvaraj <joelselvaraj.oss@...il.com>,
        Caleb Connolly <caleb@...nolly.tech>,
        Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        Henrik Rydberg <rydberg@...math.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>,
        Jeff LaBundy <jeff@...undy.com>,
        Markuss Broks <markuss.broks@...il.com>,
        Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>,
        Job Noorman <job@...rman.info>,
        Alistair Francis <alistair@...stair23.me>,
        Chris Morgan <macromorgan@...mail.com>,
        Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Cc:     linux-input@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht, phone-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] dt-bindings: input: touchscreen: add bindings for
 focaltech,fts5452

On 14/04/2023 02:32, Joel Selvaraj wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof Kozlowski,
> 
> Konrad Dybcio suggested to use interrupts-extended instead interrupts.

Sorry,

I have no idea what this email is about.

There is no context here, no reply, it just appeared alone in my inbox
without any reference. Please respond inline to existing messages,
keeping necessary context you are replying to.

> So in my WIP v3, I have updated it in the dts and bindings example.
> However, I am confused if I should replace the "interrupts" with
> "interrupts-extended" property in the schema too? I see a lot of schemas

No.

> specifying "interrupts", with examples using "interrupts" or
> "interrupts-extended". At the same time, I see some specifying both
> "interrupts" and "interrupts-extended" (like one of these two) and very
> few others specify only "interrupts-extended" in the schema. Which is
> the currently recommended way to do this?
> 
> In between, the interrupt property should be a required property as the
> driver will not function without an interrupt. I will fix that in v3.
> 
> Thanks,
> Joel Selvaraj

Best regards,
Krzysztof