[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f8a4fd52-52b6-dded-c8b7-864be549e2ad@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2023 10:34:47 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Cc: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>, matthias.bgg@...il.com,
p.zabel@...gutronix.de, airlied@...il.com, daniel@...ll.ch,
robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
jassisinghbrar@...il.com, chunfeng.yun@...iatek.com,
vkoul@...nel.org, kishon@...nel.org, thierry.reding@...il.com,
chunkuang.hu@...nel.org, ck.hu@...iatek.com,
jitao.shi@...iatek.com, xinlei.lee@...iatek.com,
houlong.wei@...iatek.com, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...labora.com, phone-devel@...r.kernel.org,
~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/27] dt-bindings: pwm: Add compatible for MediaTek
MT6795
On 14/04/2023 10:30, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 14, 2023 at 10:21:05AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 12/04/2023 13:27, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
>>> Add a compatible string for MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795's display PWM
>>> block: this is the same as MT8173.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
>>> ---
>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/mediatek,pwm-disp.yaml | 4 +++-
>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/mediatek,pwm-disp.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/mediatek,pwm-disp.yaml
>>> index 0088bc8e7c54..153e146df7d4 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/mediatek,pwm-disp.yaml
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/mediatek,pwm-disp.yaml
>>> @@ -22,7 +22,9 @@ properties:
>>> - mediatek,mt8173-disp-pwm
>>> - mediatek,mt8183-disp-pwm
>>> - items:
>>> - - const: mediatek,mt8167-disp-pwm
>>> + - enum:
>>> + - mediatek,mt6795-disp-pwm
>>> + - mediatek,mt8167-disp-pwm
>>
>> This does not look correct. You do not add compatible, you replace
>> breaking all mt8167-disp-pwm. At least it looks like this from context.
>
> I thought the old semantic to be:
>
> "mediatek,mt8167-disp-pwm"
>
> and the new
>
> "mediatek,mt6795-disp-pwm" or "mediatek,mt8167-disp-pwm"
>
> . What am I missing?
The new is ok for mt6795 but it is not valid for mt8167.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists