[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ada769e0-0141-634f-3753-eb3a50f0eee3@collabora.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2023 12:31:47 +0200
From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
To: Guillaume Ranquet <granquet@...libre.com>,
Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@...nel.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@...iatek.com>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...nel.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] phy: mediatek: hdmi: mt8195: fix uninitialized
variable usage in pll_calc
Il 13/04/23 14:46, Guillaume Ranquet ha scritto:
> The ret variable in mtk_hdmi_pll_calc() was used unitialized as reported
> by the kernel test robot.
>
> Fix the issue by removing the variable altogether and testing out the
> return value of mtk_hdmi_pll_set_hw()
>
> Fixes: 45810d486bb44 ("phy: mediatek: add support for phy-mtk-hdmi-mt8195")
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Guillaume Ranquet <granquet@...libre.com>
> ---
> drivers/phy/mediatek/phy-mtk-hdmi-mt8195.c | 7 +++----
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/phy/mediatek/phy-mtk-hdmi-mt8195.c b/drivers/phy/mediatek/phy-mtk-hdmi-mt8195.c
> index abfc077fb0a8..e10da6c4147e 100644
> --- a/drivers/phy/mediatek/phy-mtk-hdmi-mt8195.c
> +++ b/drivers/phy/mediatek/phy-mtk-hdmi-mt8195.c
> @@ -213,7 +213,7 @@ static int mtk_hdmi_pll_calc(struct mtk_hdmi_phy *hdmi_phy, struct clk_hw *hw,
> u64 tmds_clk, pixel_clk, da_hdmitx21_ref_ck, ns_hdmipll_ck, pcw;
> u8 txpredivs[4] = { 2, 4, 6, 12 };
> u32 fbkdiv_low;
> - int i, ret;
> + int i;
>
> pixel_clk = rate;
> tmds_clk = pixel_clk;
> @@ -292,10 +292,9 @@ static int mtk_hdmi_pll_calc(struct mtk_hdmi_phy *hdmi_phy, struct clk_hw *hw,
> if (!(digital_div <= 32 && digital_div >= 1))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - mtk_hdmi_pll_set_hw(hw, PLL_PREDIV, fbkdiv_high, fbkdiv_low,
> + if (mtk_hdmi_pll_set_hw(hw, PLL_PREDIV, fbkdiv_high, fbkdiv_low,
> PLL_FBKDIV_HS3, posdiv1, posdiv2, txprediv,
> - txposdiv, digital_div);
> - if (ret)
> + txposdiv, digital_div))
> return -EINVAL;
>
I don't get why we're returning -EINVAL unconditionally in the first place, here.
Function mtk_hdmi_pll_set_hw() should return zero or a negative error number: in
that case, the previous *intention* was fine, so this should be
ret = mtk_hdmi_pll_set_hw(....)
if (ret)
return ret;
return 0;
Regards,
Angelo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists