[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9e77c30c-0770-6cb7-cb75-2e22bc52b8d2@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2023 09:18:56 +0800
From: Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>
To: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v2] f2fs: relax sanity check if checkpoint is
corrupted
On 2023/4/13 23:52, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 04/13, Chao Yu wrote:
>> On 2023/4/13 0:17, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>>> 1. extent_cache
>>> - let's drop the largest extent_cache
>>> 2. invalidate_block
>>> - don't show the warnings
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> Change log from v1:
>>> - add one more case to skip the error message
>>>
>>> fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c | 10 ++++++++++
>>> fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c | 22 +++++++++++++++-------
>>> 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
>>> index 448ecf5000b8..64b3860f50ee 100644
>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
>>> @@ -152,6 +152,11 @@ static bool __is_bitmap_valid(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, block_t blkaddr,
>>> se = get_seg_entry(sbi, segno);
>>> exist = f2fs_test_bit(offset, se->cur_valid_map);
>>> +
>>> + /* skip data, if we already have an error in checkpoint. */
>>> + if (unlikely(f2fs_cp_error(sbi)))
>>> + return exist;
>>> +
>>> if (exist && type == DATA_GENERIC_ENHANCE_UPDATE) {
>>> f2fs_err(sbi, "Inconsistent error blkaddr:%u, sit bitmap:%d",
>>> blkaddr, exist);
>>> @@ -202,6 +207,11 @@ bool f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>>> case DATA_GENERIC_ENHANCE_UPDATE:
>>> if (unlikely(blkaddr >= MAX_BLKADDR(sbi) ||
>>> blkaddr < MAIN_BLKADDR(sbi))) {
>>> +
>>> + /* Skip to emit an error message. */
>>> + if (unlikely(f2fs_cp_error(sbi)))
>>> + return false;
>>> +
>>> f2fs_warn(sbi, "access invalid blkaddr:%u",
>>> blkaddr);
>>> set_sbi_flag(sbi, SBI_NEED_FSCK);
>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c b/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c
>>> index 9a8153895d20..bea6ab9d846a 100644
>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c
>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c
>>> @@ -23,18 +23,26 @@ bool sanity_check_extent_cache(struct inode *inode)
>>> {
>>> struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi = F2FS_I_SB(inode);
>>> struct f2fs_inode_info *fi = F2FS_I(inode);
>>> + struct extent_tree *et = fi->extent_tree[EX_READ];
>>> struct extent_info *ei;
>>> - if (!fi->extent_tree[EX_READ])
>>> + if (!et)
>>> + return true;
>>> +
>>> + ei = &et->largest;
>>> + if (!ei->len)
>>> return true;
>>> - ei = &fi->extent_tree[EX_READ]->largest;
>>> + /* Let's drop, if checkpoint got corrupted. */
>>> + if (is_set_ckpt_flags(sbi, CP_ERROR_FLAG)) {
>>> + ei->len = 0;
>>> + et->largest_updated = true;
>>
>> Thsi field indicates whether it is needed to update largest extent into
>> inode page, since cp_error is unrecoverable, it seems we don't needed to
>> update it.
>
> Intention is to avoid any assumption like that, but sync the same logic when
> updating this.
Sure, fine to me.
Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>
Thanks,
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>> + return true;
>>> + }
>>> - if (ei->len &&
>>> - (!f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr(sbi, ei->blk,
>>> - DATA_GENERIC_ENHANCE) ||
>>> - !f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr(sbi, ei->blk + ei->len - 1,
>>> - DATA_GENERIC_ENHANCE))) {
>>> + if (!f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr(sbi, ei->blk, DATA_GENERIC_ENHANCE) ||
>>> + !f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr(sbi, ei->blk + ei->len - 1,
>>> + DATA_GENERIC_ENHANCE)) {
>>> set_sbi_flag(sbi, SBI_NEED_FSCK);
>>> f2fs_warn(sbi, "%s: inode (ino=%lx) extent info [%u, %u, %u] is incorrect, run fsck to fix",
>>> __func__, inode->i_ino,
Powered by blists - more mailing lists