linux-kernel - [RFC 4/4] fs/buffer: convert create_page_buffers to create_folio

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 14 Apr 2023 13:08:21 +0200
From:   Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@...sung.com>
To:     brauner@...nel.org, willy@...radead.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc:     linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        mcgrof@...nel.org, gost.dev@...sung.com, hare@...e.de,
        Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@...sung.com>
Subject: [RFC 4/4] fs/buffer: convert create_page_buffers to
 create_folio_buffers

fs/buffer do not support large folios as there are many assumptions on
the folio size to be the host page size. This conversion is one step
towards removing that assumption. Also this conversion will reduce calls
to compound_head() if create_folio_buffers() calls
folio_create_empty_buffers().

Signed-off-by: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@...sung.com>
---
 fs/buffer.c | 23 +++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/buffer.c b/fs/buffer.c
index 9e6a1a738fb5..a83d9bf78ca5 100644
--- a/fs/buffer.c
+++ b/fs/buffer.c
@@ -1802,14 +1802,17 @@ static inline int block_size_bits(unsigned int blocksize)
 	return ilog2(blocksize);
 }
 
-static struct buffer_head *create_page_buffers(struct page *page, struct inode *inode, unsigned int b_state)
+static struct buffer_head *create_folio_buffers(struct folio *folio,
+						struct inode *inode,
+						unsigned int b_state)
 {
-	BUG_ON(!PageLocked(page));
+	BUG_ON(!folio_test_locked(folio));
 
-	if (!page_has_buffers(page))
-		create_empty_buffers(page, 1 << READ_ONCE(inode->i_blkbits),
-				     b_state);
-	return page_buffers(page);
+	if (!folio_buffers(folio))
+		folio_create_empty_buffers(folio,
+					   1 << READ_ONCE(inode->i_blkbits),
+					   b_state);
+	return folio_buffers(folio);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1853,8 +1856,8 @@ int __block_write_full_page(struct inode *inode, struct page *page,
 	int nr_underway = 0;
 	blk_opf_t write_flags = wbc_to_write_flags(wbc);
 
-	head = create_page_buffers(page, inode,
-					(1 << BH_Dirty)|(1 << BH_Uptodate));
+	head = create_folio_buffers(page_folio(page), inode,
+				    (1 << BH_Dirty) | (1 << BH_Uptodate));
 
 	/*
 	 * Be very careful.  We have no exclusion from block_dirty_folio
@@ -2117,7 +2120,7 @@ int __block_write_begin_int(struct folio *folio, loff_t pos, unsigned len,
 	BUG_ON(to > PAGE_SIZE);
 	BUG_ON(from > to);
 
-	head = create_page_buffers(&folio->page, inode, 0);
+	head = create_folio_buffers(folio, inode, 0);
 	blocksize = head->b_size;
 	bbits = block_size_bits(blocksize);
 
@@ -2403,7 +2406,7 @@ int block_read_full_folio(struct folio *folio, get_block_t *get_block)
 
 	VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(folio_test_large(folio), folio);
 
-	head = create_page_buffers(&folio->page, inode, 0);
+	head = create_folio_buffers(folio, inode, 0);
 	blocksize = head->b_size;
 	bbits = block_size_bits(blocksize);
 
-- 
2.34.1