[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3bf69efaeddae3599a6d7ea8a225f64066811473.camel@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2023 16:27:15 +0000
From: "Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>
To: "Liam.Howlett@...cle.com" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm/mmap: Regression fix for unmapped_area{_topdown}
On Fri, 2023-04-14 at 10:57 -0400, Liam R. Howlett wrote:<br>
> + tmp = mas_next(&mas, ULONG_MAX);
> + if (tmp && (tmp->vm_flags & VM_GROWSDOWN)) {
Why also check VM_GROWSDOWN here (and VM_GROWSUP below)?
vm_start/end_gap() already have checks inside.
> + if (vm_start_gap(tmp) < gap + length - 1) {
> + low_limit = tmp->vm_end;
> + mas_reset(&mas);
> + goto retry;
> + }
> + } else {
> + tmp = mas_prev(&mas, 0);
> + if (tmp && (tmp->vm_flags & VM_GROWSUP) &&
> + vm_end_gap(tmp) > gap) {
> + low_limit = vm_end_gap(tmp);
> + mas_reset(&mas);
> + goto retry;
> + }
> + }
> +
Could it be like this?
tmp = mas_next(&mas, ULONG_MAX);
if (tmp && vm_start_gap(tmp) < gap + length - 1) {
low_limit = tmp->vm_end;
mas_reset(&mas);
goto retry;
}
} else {
tmp = mas_prev(&mas, 0);
if (tmp && vm_end_gap(tmp) > gap) {
low_limit = vm_end_gap(tmp);
mas_reset(&mas);
goto retry;
}
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists