[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAA8EJprnD0jSH7JvhoEnqhNxC55TeqCvvR64R7U8Ni7M93N2eQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2023 19:45:15 +0300
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Taniya Das <tdas@...eaurora.org>,
Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: clock: qcom,videocc: Add SM8350
On Fri, 14 Apr 2023 at 18:18, Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On 14/04/2023 13:26, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> > SM8350, like most recent higher-end chips has a separate clock
> > controller block just for the Venus IP. Document it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
> > ---
> > .../devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,videocc.yaml | 29 +++++++++++++
>
> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Krzysztof, Konrad, would it make sense to split it into separate
bindings? After all, previous videocc bindings used clock-names, while
this one doesn't.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists