[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230415165904.791841-4-ammarfaizi2@gnuweeb.org>
Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2023 23:59:04 +0700
From: Ammar Faizi <ammarfaizi2@...weeb.org>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: Ammar Faizi <ammarfaizi2@...weeb.org>,
Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>,
Alviro Iskandar Setiawan <alviro.iskandar@...weeb.org>,
io-uring Mailing List <io-uring@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
GNU/Weeb Mailing List <gwml@...r.gnuweeb.org>
Subject: [PATCH liburing 3/3] man/io_uring_cqe_get_data.3: Fix a misleading return value
Since commit 8ecd3fd959634df8 ("Don't clear sqe->user_data as part of
command prep"), the prep functions no longer zero the user data. If the
user_data is not set, it will contain whatever previous value in it.
Therefore, the returned value when the user_data is-not-set is not
always NULL. And oh, someone once hit an issue because they assume the
return value is NULL if the user_data is not set. See the link below.
Fix the manpage, tell that the return value will be undefined.
Link: https://github.com/axboe/liburing/issues/575#issuecomment-1110516140
Signed-off-by: Ammar Faizi <ammarfaizi2@...weeb.org>
---
man/io_uring_cqe_get_data.3 | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/man/io_uring_cqe_get_data.3 b/man/io_uring_cqe_get_data.3
index 4cbb32cd864e12c2..a4d2988a49d92aa8 100644
--- a/man/io_uring_cqe_get_data.3
+++ b/man/io_uring_cqe_get_data.3
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ or
If the
.I user_data
value has been set before submitting the request, it will be returned.
-Otherwise the functions returns NULL.
+Otherwise, the return value is undefined.
.SH SEE ALSO
.BR io_uring_get_sqe (3),
.BR io_uring_sqe_set_data (3),
--
Ammar Faizi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists