linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v2] nvme/tcp: Add support to set the tcp worker cpu affinity

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3e45f600db2049c4986fd8bb6aea69f4@AcuMS.aculab.com>
Date:   Sat, 15 Apr 2023 21:06:36 +0000
From:   David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To:     'Li Feng' <fengli@...rtx.com>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>
CC:     Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>,
        "Christoph Hellwig" <hch@....de>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
        "open list:NVM EXPRESS DRIVER" <linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "lifeng1519@...il.com" <lifeng1519@...il.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] nvme/tcp: Add support to set the tcp worker cpu
 affinity

From: Li Feng
> Sent: 14 April 2023 10:35
> >
> > On 4/13/23 15:29, Li Feng wrote:
> > > The default worker affinity policy is using all online cpus, e.g. from 0
> > > to N-1. However, some cpus are busy for other jobs, then the nvme-tcp will
> > > have a bad performance.
> > >
> > > This patch adds a module parameter to set the cpu affinity for the nvme-tcp
> > > socket worker threads.  The parameter is a comma separated list of CPU
> > > numbers.  The list is parsed and the resulting cpumask is used to set the
> > > affinity of the socket worker threads.  If the list is empty or the
> > > parsing fails, the default affinity is used.
> > >
...
> > I am not in favour of this.
> > NVMe-over-Fabrics has _virtual_ queues, which really have no
> > relationship to the underlying hardware.
> > So trying to be clever here by tacking queues to CPUs sort of works if
> > you have one subsystem to talk to, but if you have several where each
> > exposes a _different_ number of queues you end up with a quite
> > suboptimal setting (ie you rely on the resulting cpu sets to overlap,
> > but there is no guarantee that they do).
> 
> Thanks for your comment.
> The current io-queues/cpu map method is not optimal.
> It is stupid, and just starts from 0 to the last CPU, which is not configurable.

Module parameters suck, and passing the buck to the user
when you can't decide how to do something isn't a good idea either.

If the system is busy pinning threads to cpus is very hard to
get right.

It can be better to set the threads to run at the lowest RT
priority - so they have priority over all 'normal' threads
and also have a very sticky (but not fixed) cpu affinity so
that all such threads tends to get spread out by the scheduler.
This all works best if the number of RT threads isn't greater
than the number of physical cpu.

	David

-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)