linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the char-misc tree with the devicetree tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 15 Apr 2023 07:52:55 +0200
From:   Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:     broonie@...nel.org
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the char-misc tree with the
 devicetree tree

On Fri, Apr 14, 2023 at 04:13:26PM +0100, broonie@...nel.org wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the char-misc tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   include/linux/of.h
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   82174a0a9c5cf ("of: Move of_device_get_match_data() declaration")
> 
> from the devicetree tree and commit:
> 
>   673aa1ed1c9b6 ("of: Rename of_modalias_node()")
> 
> from the char-misc tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 
> diff --cc include/linux/of.h
> index bc2eb39dcf753,9b7a99499ef35..0000000000000
> --- a/include/linux/of.h
> +++ b/include/linux/of.h
> @@@ -370,8 -373,8 +370,9 @@@ extern int of_n_addr_cells(struct devic
>   extern int of_n_size_cells(struct device_node *np);
>   extern const struct of_device_id *of_match_node(
>   	const struct of_device_id *matches, const struct device_node *node);
>  +extern const void *of_device_get_match_data(const struct device *dev);
> - extern int of_modalias_node(struct device_node *node, char *modalias, int len);
> + extern int of_alias_from_compatible(const struct device_node *node, char *alias,
> + 				    int len);
>   extern void of_print_phandle_args(const char *msg, const struct of_phandle_args *args);
>   extern int __of_parse_phandle_with_args(const struct device_node *np,
>   	const char *list_name, const char *cells_name, int cell_count,

Looks good to me, thanks!

greg k-h