[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230415070406.GJ25053@google.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2023 16:04:06 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@...gle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] seq_buf: add seq_buf_do_printk() helper
On (23/04/14 11:00), Petr Mladek wrote:
> > +void seq_buf_do_printk(struct seq_buf *s, const char *lvl)
> > +{
> > + const char *start, *lf;
> > + int len;
> > +
> > + if (s->size == 0 || s->len == 0)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + seq_buf_terminate(s);
> > +
> > + start = s->buffer;
> > + while ((lf = strchr(start, '\n'))) {
> > + len = lf - start + 1;
> > + printk("%s%.*s", lvl, len, start);
> > + start = ++lf;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* No trailing LF */
> > + if (start < s->buffer + s->len) {
> > + len = s->buffer + s->len - start;
> > + printk("%s%.*s\n", lvl, len, start);
>
> We know that the string is '\0' terminated, so the last print
> might be easier:
>
> if (start < s->buffer + s->len)
> printk("%s%s\n", lvl, start);
Indeed. Steven, let me know if you'd prefer a v3.
> Anyway, it looks good. With or without this change:
>
> Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Thanks Petr!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists