lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sun, 16 Apr 2023 15:37:04 +0100
From:   Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To:     Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
Cc:     Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
        Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>,
        Nuno Sá <noname.nuno@...il.com>,
        Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
        Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org,
        Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 06/11] iio: buffer-dmaengine: Enable write support

On Mon,  3 Apr 2023 17:47:55 +0200
Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net> wrote:

> Use the iio_dma_buffer_write() and iio_dma_buffer_space_available()
> functions provided by the buffer-dma core, to enable write support in
> the buffer-dmaengine code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
> Reviewed-by: Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@...il.com>
> ---
>  drivers/iio/buffer/industrialio-buffer-dmaengine.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/buffer/industrialio-buffer-dmaengine.c b/drivers/iio/buffer/industrialio-buffer-dmaengine.c
> index 592d2aa9044c..866c8b84bb24 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/buffer/industrialio-buffer-dmaengine.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/buffer/industrialio-buffer-dmaengine.c
> @@ -123,12 +123,14 @@ static void iio_dmaengine_buffer_release(struct iio_buffer *buf)
>  
>  static const struct iio_buffer_access_funcs iio_dmaengine_buffer_ops = {
>  	.read = iio_dma_buffer_read,
> +	.write = iio_dma_buffer_write,
>  	.set_bytes_per_datum = iio_dma_buffer_set_bytes_per_datum,
>  	.set_length = iio_dma_buffer_set_length,
>  	.request_update = iio_dma_buffer_request_update,
>  	.enable = iio_dma_buffer_enable,
>  	.disable = iio_dma_buffer_disable,
>  	.data_available = iio_dma_buffer_data_available,
> +	.space_available = iio_dma_buffer_space_available,
Follow through from earlier patch.  I would prefer it to be obvious
hers that the two callbacks above are identical.  Easiest way to
expose that detail is to set the callbacks to the same function, but then
it perhaps needs a rename so it isn't specific to one of the other.

Jonathan

>  	.release = iio_dmaengine_buffer_release,
>  
>  	.modes = INDIO_BUFFER_HARDWARE,

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ