[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230416113335.caeafda1328fdd4bfe2406e8@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2023 11:33:35 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: "Zach O'Keefe" <zokeefe@...gle.com>
Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>,
Ivan Orlov <ivan.orlov0322@...il.com>,
himadrispandya@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
skhan@...uxfoundation.org,
syzbot+9578faa5475acb35fa50@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm: khugepaged: Fix kernel BUG in
hpage_collapse_scan_file
Circling back to this fix...
The BUG() is obviously real. We're unsure that Ivan's fix is the best
one. We haven't identified a Fixes:, and as this report is against the 6.2
kernel, a cc:stable will be needed.
According to the sysbot bisection
(https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=7d6bb3760e026ece7524500fe44fb024a0e959fc),
this is present in linux-5.19, so it might predate Zach's
58ac9a8993a13ebc changes. But that bisection claim might be
misleading.
And Zach is offline for a few months. So can people please take a look
and see if we can get this wrapped up?
Matthew, the assertion failure is in the
VM_BUG_ON(index != xas.xa_index);
which was added in 77da9389b9d5f, so perhaps you could take a look?
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists