lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <168176326315.1296984.11419887064802720363.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 17 Apr 2023 21:27:43 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@...il.com>,
        Xiubo Li <Xiubo.Lee@...il.com>,
        Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
        Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@...il.com>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
        Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>, Liliang Ye <yll@...t.edu.cn>
Cc:     hust-os-kernel-patches@...glegroups.com,
        alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ASoC: fsl_mqs: move of_node_put() to the correct
 location

On Mon, 03 Apr 2023 23:26:47 +0800, Liliang Ye wrote:
> of_node_put() should have been done directly after
> mqs_priv->regmap = syscon_node_to_regmap(gpr_np);
> otherwise it creates a reference leak on the success path.
> 
> To fix this, of_node_put() is moved to the correct location, and change
> all the gotos to direct returns.
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/2] ASoC: fsl_mqs: move of_node_put() to the correct location
      commit: 1c34890273a020d61d6127ade3f68ed1cb21c16a

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ