[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230412-no_stackp-v1-1-86d2034a4d06@google.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2023 14:54:07 -0700
From: ndesaulniers@...gle.com
To: "Borislav Petkov (AMD)" <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, llvm@...ts.linux.dev,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] start_kernel: add no_stack_protector fn attr
Back during the discussion of
commit a9a3ed1eff36 ("x86: Fix early boot crash on gcc-10, third try")
we discussed the need for a function attribute to control the omission
of stack protectors on a per-function basis; at the time Clang had
support for no_stack_protector but GCC did not. This was fixed in
gcc-11. Now that the function attribute is available, let's start using
it.
Callers of boot_init_stack_canary need to use this function attribute
unless they're compiled with -fno-stack-protector, otherwise the canary
stored in the stack slot of the caller will differ upon the call to
boot_init_stack_canary. This will lead to a call to __stack_chk_fail
then panic.
Link: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94722
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20200316130414.GC12561@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net/
Tested-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au> (powerpc)
Acked-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c | 1 +
include/linux/compiler_attributes.h | 12 ++++++++++++
init/main.c | 3 ++-
3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
index f62e5e651bcd..48acae0da034 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
@@ -1603,6 +1603,7 @@ static void add_cpu_to_masks(int cpu)
}
/* Activate a secondary processor. */
+__no_stack_protector
void start_secondary(void *unused)
{
unsigned int cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
diff --git a/include/linux/compiler_attributes.h b/include/linux/compiler_attributes.h
index e659cb6fded3..84864767a56a 100644
--- a/include/linux/compiler_attributes.h
+++ b/include/linux/compiler_attributes.h
@@ -255,6 +255,18 @@
*/
#define __noreturn __attribute__((__noreturn__))
+/*
+ * Optional: only supported since GCC >= 11.1, clang >= 7.0.
+ *
+ * gcc: https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Common-Function-Attributes.html#index-no_005fstack_005fprotector-function-attribute
+ * clang: https://clang.llvm.org/docs/AttributeReference.html#no-stack-protector-safebuffers
+ */
+#if __has_attribute(__no_stack_protector__)
+# define __no_stack_protector __attribute__((__no_stack_protector__))
+#else
+# define __no_stack_protector
+#endif
+
/*
* Optional: not supported by gcc.
*
diff --git a/init/main.c b/init/main.c
index 5d6365510173..1265c8d11052 100644
--- a/init/main.c
+++ b/init/main.c
@@ -941,7 +941,8 @@ static void __init print_unknown_bootoptions(void)
memblock_free(unknown_options, len);
}
-asmlinkage __visible void __init __no_sanitize_address __noreturn start_kernel(void)
+asmlinkage __visible __init __no_sanitize_address __noreturn __no_stack_protector
+void start_kernel(void)
{
char *command_line;
char *after_dashes;
--
2.40.0.634.g4ca3ef3211-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists