[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AM0PR04MB4723EB7A5E42A090F63EEC11D49C9@AM0PR04MB4723.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2023 07:07:59 +0000
From: Alvaro Karsz <alvaro.karsz@...id-run.com>
To: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>
CC: "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
"pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org"
<virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] virtio-net: reject small vring sizes
> Why tx timeout without frags?
Please see my response to Michael.
> > * Guest GSO/big MTU (without VIRTIO_NET_F_MRG_RXBUF?), we can't chain page size buffers anymore.
>
>
> Or, we disable the GUEST_GSO, HOST_GSO......
>
And disable VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU, quoting the spec:
"A driver SHOULD negotiate VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU if the device offers it."
We can find a way around using buffers bigger than a page size like Michael implied.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists