[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87pm82x1ew.fsf@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2023 13:12:39 +0300
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
ath10k@...ts.infradead.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] dt-bindings: net: Convert ATH10K to YAML
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org> writes:
> Convert the ATH10K bindings to YAML.
>
> Dropped properties that are absent at the current state of mainline:
> - qcom,msi_addr
> - qcom,msi_base
Very good, thanks. Clearly I had missed that those were unused during
the review.
> qcom,coexist-support and qcom,coexist-gpio-pin do very little and should
> be reconsidered on the driver side, especially the latter one.
I'm curious, what do you mean very little? We set ath10k firmware
parameters based on these coex properties. How would you propose to
handle these?
> Somewhat based on the ath11k bindings.
>
> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
[...]
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/qcom,ath10k.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,358 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/net/wireless/qcom,ath10k.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: Qualcomm Technologies ATH10K wireless devices
[...]
> + wifi-firmware:
> + type: object
> + additionalProperties: false
> + description: |
> + The ATH10K Wi-Fi node can contain one optional firmware subnode.
> + Firmware subnode is needed when the platform does not have Trustzone.
Is there a reason why you write ath10k in upper case? There are two case
of that in the yaml file. We usually write it in lower case, can I
change to that?
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
Powered by blists - more mailing lists