linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] arm64: dts: ti: k3-j7200-som-p0: Add TP6594 family PMICs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 17 Apr 2023 12:05:04 +0200
From:   "Esteban Blanc" <eblanc@...libre.com>
To:     "Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        <nm@...com>, <vigneshr@...com>, <kristo@...nel.org>,
        <robh+dt@...nel.org>, <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>
Cc:     <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <sterzik@...com>, <u-kumar1@...com>, <jneanne@...libre.com>,
        <jpanis@...libre.com>, <aseketeli@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] arm64: dts: ti: k3-j7200-som-p0: Add TP6594
 family PMICs

On Fri Apr 14, 2023 at 1:36 PM CEST, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 14/04/2023 13:28, Esteban Blanc wrote:
> > TPS6594 is a Power Management IC which provides regulators and others
> > features like GPIOs, RTC, watchdog, ESMs (Error Signal Monitor), and
> > PFSM (Pre-configurable Finite State Machine). The SoC and the PMIC can
> > communicate through the I2C or SPI interfaces.
> > TPS6594 is the super-set device while TPS6593 and LP8764 are derivatives.
> > 
> > This should be applied on top of other patch series:
> > - https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230406075622.8990-1-jpanis@baylibre.com/
> >   For core MFD driver
> > - https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230414101217.1342891-1-eblanc@baylibre.com/
> >   For regulator driver
>
> Why? DTS cannot be merged with drivers, so if you insist on such
> dependency then:
> 1. Your patchset is broken,
> 2. I actually does not understand why,
> 3. NAK - don't merge DTS into driver branches.
>
> You probably are misunderstanding branches and dependencies.

There is no dependency indeed. We thought that dt-bindings patch at least had
to be applied before this DT series even if it is not a 'dependency', the other
link was a mistake. I will remove these misleading links in next cover-letter.

Thanks for your time. Best regards,

-- 
Esteban Blanc
BayLibre