[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <83c5a35a-c646-cbc7-83f9-c02fcb24e069@starfivetech.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2023 18:06:29 +0800
From: Hal Feng <hal.feng@...rfivetech.com>
To: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
CC: <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>, <oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev>,
<linux-mm@...ck.org>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Paul Gazzillo <paul@...zz.com>,
"Necip Fazil Yildiran" <fazilyildiran@...il.com>,
Emil Renner Berthing <emil.renner.berthing@...onical.com>,
Xingyu Wu <xingyu.wu@...rfivetech.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] clk: starfive: Fix RESET_STARFIVE_JH7110 can't be
selected in a specified case
On Mon, 17 Apr 2023 10:54:09 +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 03:41:14PM +0800, Hal Feng wrote:
>> When (ARCH_STARFIVE [=n] && COMPILE_TEST [=y] && RESET_CONTROLLER [=n]),
>> RESET_STARFIVE_JH7110 can't be selected by CLK_STARFIVE_JH7110_SYS
>> and CLK_STARFIVE_JH7110_AON.
>>
>> Considering RESET_STARFIVE_JH7110 is not a necessary option for compilation
>> test, we should select it only if ARCH_STARFIVE=y. Also, delete redundant
>> selected options of CLK_STARFIVE_JH7110_AON because these options are
>> already selected by the dependency.
>>
>> Fixes: edab7204afe5 ("clk: starfive: Add StarFive JH7110 system clock driver")
>> Fixes: b2ab3c94f41f ("clk: starfive: Add StarFive JH7110 always-on clock driver")
>> Signed-off-by: Hal Feng <hal.feng@...rfivetech.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/clk/starfive/Kconfig | 5 +----
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/starfive/Kconfig b/drivers/clk/starfive/Kconfig
>> index 71c1148ee5f6..3fad4adee841 100644
>> --- a/drivers/clk/starfive/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/clk/starfive/Kconfig
>> @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ config CLK_STARFIVE_JH7110_SYS
>> depends on ARCH_STARFIVE || COMPILE_TEST
>> select AUXILIARY_BUS
>> select CLK_STARFIVE_JH71X0
>> - select RESET_STARFIVE_JH7110
>> + select RESET_STARFIVE_JH7110 if ARCH_STARFIVE
>
> Hmm, I don't really follow the logic above.
> Why not just make the if be `if RESET_CONTROLLER` rather than
> ARCH_STARFIVE?
> I'm probably missing some obvious reason why not.
Note that RESET_CONTROLLER is selected by ARCH_STARFIVE. Thanks.
Best regards,
Hal
Powered by blists - more mailing lists