lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <69fc3a73-f18b-0268-6431-1b8b6aeed8ff@endrift.com>
Date:   Mon, 17 Apr 2023 04:07:27 -0700
From:   Vicki Pfau <vi@...rift.com>
To:     Dongliang Mu <dzm91@...t.edu.cn>, Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>
Cc:     Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
        Pavel Rojtberg <rojtberg@...il.com>,
        Nate Yocom <nate@...om.org>,
        Mattijs Korpershoek <mkorpershoek@...libre.com>,
        John Butler <radon86dev@...il.com>,
        Matthias Benkmann <matthias.benkmann@...il.com>,
        Christopher Crockett <chaorace@...il.com>,
        Santosh De Massari <s.demassari@...il.com>,
        hust-os-kernel-patches@...glegroups.com,
        syzbot+a3f758b8d8cb7e49afec@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
        "Pierre-Loup A. Griffais" <pgriffais@...vesoftware.com>,
        linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Input: xpad - fix GPF in xpad_probe



On 4/17/23 03:33, Dongliang Mu wrote:
>
> On 2023/4/17 18:24, Vicki Pfau wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 4/17/23 03:01, Dongliang Mu wrote:
>>> On 2023/4/17 17:25, Dan Carpenter wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Apr 14, 2023 at 08:55:47PM +0800, Dongliang Mu wrote:
>>>>> In xpad_probe(), it does not allocate xpad->dev with input_dev type.
>>>>> Then, when it invokes dev_warn with 1st argument - &xpad->dev->dev, it
>>>>> would trigger GPF.
>>>> What is a call tree for this?  Actually I found it from the bug report.
>>>> drivers/input/joystick/xpad.c
>>>>     2034                  if (error)
>>>>     2035                          dev_warn(&xpad->dev->dev,
>>>>     2036                                   "unable to receive magic message: %d\n",
>>>>     2037                                   error);
>>>>     2038          }
>> Sorry, this appears to be my code, and was merged recently after a few drafts with Dmitry. This code is sensitive to being moved and only affects some controllers, so I'm looking into if I can move it into after creation of the input_dev right now. It's something I'd already thought might be necessary, but I didn't find any evidence for it before. I'll try to get back to you on that soon.
>
> If this is necessary, we can change it with another device pointer. Otherwise, we need to move it after the allocation and assignment. Or move the allocation and assignment before which is not suggested.
>
> Thanks for your reply. Do I need to submit a v2 patch? Or you will take care of it?

I'll take care of it. I have a patch prepared, but I need to do a bit more testing before I can confirm it doesn't break one specific controller. I'll try to file it as soon as possible. Do you have a timeframe you need this by?

>
> Dongliang Mu
>
>>> Hi Dan,
>>>
>>> this only occurs in linux-next tree.
>>>
>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/drivers/input/joystick/xpad.c?n2053#n2053
>>>
>>>>> Fix this by allocating xpad->dev, its error handling and cleanup
>>>>> operations in the remove function.
>>>>>
>>>>> Note that this crash does not have any reproducer, so the patch
>>>>> only passes compilation testing.
>>>> The xpad->dev = input_dev; already happens in xpad_init_input().  We
>>>> shouldn't allocate it twice.  I think the fix is to just use a different
>>>> device pointer for the dev_warn().  Why not use &xpad->intf->dev?
>>> Yeah, the allocation and assignment is in the last part that I missed before. We have two choices to fix this issue:
>>>
>>> 1. Change to another device pointer;
>>>
>>> 2. Move the allocation and assignment to a previous code site;
>>>
>>> If there is no other places dereferencing this pointer before the allocation and assignment, it's better to use the 1st one.
>>>
>>> Let me craft a v2 patch.
>>>
>>>>> Reported-by: syzbot+a3f758b8d8cb7e49afec@...kaller.appspotmail.com
>>>> Could you use a Link tag to link to the bug report?
>>>> Link: https://groups.google.com/g/syzkaller-bugs/c/iMhTgpGuIbM
>>> Sure, no problem.
>>>> This needs a Fixes tag.
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: db7220c48d8d ("Input: xpad - fix support for some third-party controllers")
>>>>
>>>> regards,
>>>> dan carpenter
>>>>
>> Vicki
Vicki

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ