linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 4/5] usb: dwc3-meson-g12a: support OTG switch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 17 Apr 2023 14:47:39 +0300
From:   Dmitry Rokosov <ddrokosov@...rdevices.ru>
To:     Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>
CC:     <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
        <khilman@...libre.com>, <jbrunet@...libre.com>,
        <mturquette@...libre.com>, <vkoul@...nel.org>, <kishon@...nel.org>,
        <hminas@...opsys.com>, <Thinh.Nguyen@...opsys.com>,
        <yue.wang@...ogic.com>, <hanjie.lin@...ogic.com>,
        <kernel@...rdevices.ru>, <rockosov@...il.com>,
        <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 4/5] usb: dwc3-meson-g12a: support OTG switch

Hello Martin,

Thank you for quick review, appreciate it!
Please find my comments below and in the other replies.

On Sun, Apr 16, 2023 at 10:56:36PM +0200, Martin Blumenstingl wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 14, 2023 at 5:24 PM Dmitry Rokosov <ddrokosov@...rdevices.ru> wrote:
> [...]
> >  static const struct dwc3_meson_g12a_drvdata a1_drvdata = {
> > -       .otg_switch_supported = false,
> > +       .otg_switch_supported = true,
> it would be great if you could also follow up with a patch that
> removes otg_switch_supported.
> A1 was the only variant that needed it and after this patch it's just dead code.

It makes sense. I thought about it before sending the first version, but
I found a counter-argument: future SoCs may use this parameter.
But if you ask, I will remove 'otg_switch_supported' in the next version

-- 
Thank you,
Dmitry