[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7FCAD214-5E79-4D07-A111-3657E91758B1@nutanix.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2023 11:42:15 +0000
From: Eiichi Tsukata <eiichi.tsukata@...anix.com>
To: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
CC: "eparis@...hat.com" <eparis@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"audit@...r.kernel.org" <audit@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] audit: use pid.is_auditd to make auditd_test_task()
faster
> On Apr 14, 2023, at 23:44, Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 11:14 PM Eiichi Tsukata
> <eiichi.tsukata@...anix.com> wrote:
>>
>> auditd_test_task() is a hot path of system call auditing. This patch
>> introduces a new bit field "is_auditd" in pid struct which can be used
>> for faster check of registered audit daemon.
>>
>> Benchmark
>> =========
>>
>> Run the following command:
>>
>> dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/null bs=1 count=5M
>>
>> With rule:
>>
>> -a never,exit -F arch=b64 -S uname
>>
>> Result:
>>
>> Base line : 2.572 sec
>> /w this patch: 2.412 sec (6.6% faster)
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eiichi Tsukata <eiichi.tsukata@...anix.com>
>> ---
>> include/linux/pid.h | 4 ++++
>> kernel/audit.c | 22 ++--------------------
>> kernel/audit.h | 3 ++-
>> kernel/pid.c | 3 +++
>> 4 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/pid.h b/include/linux/pid.h
>> index 343abf22092e..5fe38e254c9a 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/pid.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/pid.h
>> @@ -68,6 +68,10 @@ struct pid
>> wait_queue_head_t wait_pidfd;
>> struct rcu_head rcu;
>> struct upid numbers[1];
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_AUDIT
>> + /* registered audit daemon tgid */
>> + unsigned is_auditd:1;
>> +#endif
>> };
>
> Thank you for the patch, but I don't think we want to add an audit
> specific field to the pid struct at this time.
>
Hi Paul
I agree “is_auditd” is too specific.
How about having global “auditd_pid” struct pid pointer and let auditd_test_task() use it?
I mean:
#define auditd_test_task(tsk) (READ_ONCE(auditd_pid) == task_tgid(tsk))
By the way, it’s a bit different topic, I may have found a race in usage of auditd_pid_vnr().
In AUDIT_SET handling, the variable auditd_pid is referenced outside of the spinlock so it can be changed while it’s referenced.
So there is a TOCTOU race like this:
CPU0 CPU1
===== =====
auditd = auditd_pid_vnr()
auditd = auditd_pid_vnr()
if (auditd_pid) {…}
if (auditd_pid) {…}
auditd_set()
auditd_set()
If auditd_pid_vnr() returns 0, this case can lead to replacement of a healthy auditd, which seems to be prohibited judging from the code comment "/* replacing a healthy auditd is not allowed */“.
Please correct me if I’m wrong.
Thanks
Eiichi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists