[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230417035232.GM25053@google.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2023 12:52:32 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>
To: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@...gle.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@...gle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 0/4] zsmalloc: fine-grained fullness and new compaction
algorithm
On (23/04/16 20:55), Yu Zhao wrote:
> > Do you run some specific test?
>
> E.g.,
> tools/testing/selftests/kvm/max_guest_memory_test -c 112 -m 800 -s 800
> with 112 CPUs and ~770GB DRAM + 32GB zram.
Hmm ...
Something like this maybe?
The src zspage pointer is not NULL-ed after non-empty zspage is
put back to corresponding fullness list.
---
@@ -2239,8 +2241,8 @@ static unsigned long __zs_compact(struct zs_pool *pool,
if (fg == ZS_INUSE_RATIO_0) {
free_zspage(pool, class, src_zspage);
pages_freed += class->pages_per_zspage;
- src_zspage = NULL;
}
+ src_zspage = NULL;
if (get_fullness_group(class, dst_zspage) == ZS_INUSE_RATIO_100
|| spin_is_contended(&pool->lock)) {
Powered by blists - more mailing lists