[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMj1kXFK3uAMXgrtFofb0e2Z=eW+bMQBkbU-3MAazV3PgX_SpA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2023 16:30:32 +0200
From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
To: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 30/60] arm64: idreg-override: Create a pseudo feature
for rodata=off
On Mon, 17 Apr 2023 at 16:28, Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com> wrote:
>
> On 07/03/2023 14:04, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > Add rodata=off to the set of kernel command line options that is parsed
> > early using the CPU feature override detection code, so we can easily
> > refer to it when creating the kernel mapping.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 1 +
> > arch/arm64/kernel/pi/idreg-override.c | 2 ++
> > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> > index bc10098901808c00..edc7733aa49846b2 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> > @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
> > #define cpu_feature(x) KERNEL_HWCAP_ ## x
> >
> > #define ARM64_SW_FEATURE_OVERRIDE_NOKASLR 0
> > +#define ARM64_SW_FEATURE_OVERRIDE_RODATA_OFF 4
>
> I assume these are bit numbers? Why not just use the next available bit (bit 1)
> for this new flag?
>
This (ab)uses the CPU feature framework, which is based on 4-bit
quantities. I don't remember if it matters or not, but IIRC the
default macros use 4-bit wide values.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists