lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 18 Apr 2023 18:17:32 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Naresh Solanki <naresh.solanki@...ements.com>,
        Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>
Cc:     linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: hwmon: Add binding for max6639

On 18/04/2023 13:32, Naresh Solanki wrote:
> Add Devicetree binding documentation for Maxim MAX6639 temperature
> monitor with PWM fan-speed controller.

Subject: drop second/last, redundant "binding for". The "dt-bindings"
prefix is already stating that these are bindings.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Naresh Solanki <Naresh.Solanki@...ements.com>
> ---
>  .../bindings/hwmon/maxim,max6639.yaml         | 55 +++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 55 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/maxim,max6639.yaml
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/maxim,max6639.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/maxim,max6639.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..20b28cd36555
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/maxim,max6639.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +

Drop blank line

This is v9. Where is the changelog? Where is previous authorship? At
least some parts of it? Why this has less properties than old one? Why
this has more mistakes than the old one? Go to previous patch... or fix
everything which was already fixed.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ