linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] spi: spi-cadence: Add Slave mode support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <168183489943.88110.15232955583867742877.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 18 Apr 2023 17:21:39 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Srinivas Goud <srinivas.goud@....com>
Cc:     linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        git@....com, gcnu.goud@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] spi: spi-cadence: Add Slave mode support

On Wed, 29 Mar 2023 17:16:22 +0530, Srinivas Goud wrote:
> Replace spi_master structure with spi_controller structure.
> 
> Currently SPI Cadence controller works in Master mode only.
> Update driver to support Slave mode and also Full duplex transfer
> support in Slave mode.
> 
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/2] spi: spi-cadence: Switch to spi_controller structure
      commit: f6997e9bd879ed1f1c61e65b6fcab0de9a873ab0
[2/2] spi: spi-cadence: Add support for Slave mode
      commit: b1b90514eaa3454223d6f576a108cc0a58924a65

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark