| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2023 16:38:29 -0600
From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
To: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
Cc: jgg@...dia.com, yishaih@...dia.com,
shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com, kevin.tian@...el.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, darwi@...utronix.de, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
dave.jiang@...el.com, jing2.liu@...el.com, ashok.raj@...el.com,
fenghua.yu@...el.com, tom.zanussi@...ux.intel.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 09/10] vfio/pci: Support dynamic MSI-X
On Tue, 18 Apr 2023 10:29:20 -0700
Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com> wrote:
> Recently introduced pci_msix_alloc_irq_at() and pci_msix_free_irq()
> enables an individual MSI-X interrupt to be allocated and freed after
> MSI-X enabling.
>
> Use dynamic MSI-X (if supported by the device) to allocate an interrupt
> after MSI-X is enabled. An MSI-X interrupt is dynamically allocated at
> the time a valid eventfd is assigned. This is different behavior from
> a range provided during MSI-X enabling where interrupts are allocated
> for the entire range whether a valid eventfd is provided for each
> interrupt or not.
>
> Do not dynamically free interrupts, leave that to when MSI-X is
> disabled.
But we do, sometimes, even if essentially only on the error path. Is
that worthwhile? It seems like we could entirely remove
vfio_msi_free_irq() and rely only on pci_free_irq_vectors() on MSI/X
teardown.
I'd probably also add a comment in the commit log about the theory
behind not dynamically freeing irqs, ie. latency, reliability, and
whatever else we used to justify it. Thanks,
Alex
> Signed-off-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230403211841.0e206b67.alex.williamson@redhat.com/
> ---
> The get_cached_msi_msg()/pci_write_msi_msg() behavior is kept
> similar to the scenario when MSI-X is enabled with triggers
> provided for new interrupts. get_cached_msi_msg()/pci_write_msi_msg()
> follows for interrupts recently allocated with pci_msix_alloc_irq_at()
> just like get_cached_msi_msg()/pci_write_msi_msg() is done for
> interrupts recently allocated with pci_alloc_irq_vectors().
>
> Changes since V2:
> - Move vfio_irq_ctx_free() to earlier in series to support
> earlier usage. (Alex)
> - Use consistent terms in changelog: MSI-x changed to MSI-X.
> - Make dynamic interrupt context creation generic across all
> MSI/MSI-X interrupts. This resulted in code moving to earlier
> in series as part of xarray introduction patch. (Alex)
> - Remove the local allow_dyn_alloc and direct calling of
> pci_msix_can_alloc_dyn(), use the new vdev->has_dyn_msix
> introduced earlier instead. (Alex)
> - Stop tracking new allocations (remove "new_ctx"). (Alex)
> - Introduce new wrapper that returns Linux interrupt number or
> dynamically allocate a new interrupt. Wrapper can be used for
> all interrupt cases. (Alex)
> - Only free dynamic MSI-X interrupts on MSI-X teardown. (Alex)
>
> Changes since RFC V1:
> - Add pointer to interrupt context as function parameter to
> vfio_irq_ctx_free(). (Alex)
> - Initialize new_ctx to false. (Dan Carpenter)
> - Only support dynamic allocation if device supports it. (Alex)
>
> drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_intrs.c | 73 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 65 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_intrs.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_intrs.c
> index bdda7f46c2be..c1a3e224c867 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_intrs.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_intrs.c
> @@ -372,27 +372,74 @@ static int vfio_msi_enable(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev, int nvec, bool msi
> return 0;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Return Linux IRQ number of an MSI or MSI-X device interrupt vector.
> + * If a Linux IRQ number is not available then a new interrupt will be
> + * allocated if dynamic MSI-X is supported.
> + */
> +static int vfio_msi_alloc_irq(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev,
> + unsigned int vector, bool msix)
> +{
> + struct pci_dev *pdev = vdev->pdev;
> + struct msi_map map;
> + int irq;
> + u16 cmd;
> +
> + irq = pci_irq_vector(pdev, vector);
> + if (irq > 0 || !msix || !vdev->has_dyn_msix)
> + return irq;
> +
> + cmd = vfio_pci_memory_lock_and_enable(vdev);
> + map = pci_msix_alloc_irq_at(pdev, vector, NULL);
> + vfio_pci_memory_unlock_and_restore(vdev, cmd);
> +
> + return map.index < 0 ? map.index : map.virq;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Free interrupt if it can be re-allocated dynamically (while MSI-X
> + * is enabled).
> + */
> +static void vfio_msi_free_irq(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev,
> + unsigned int vector, bool msix)
> +{
> + struct pci_dev *pdev = vdev->pdev;
> + struct msi_map map;
> + int irq;
> + u16 cmd;
> +
> + if (!msix || !vdev->has_dyn_msix)
> + return;
> +
> + irq = pci_irq_vector(pdev, vector);
> + map = (struct msi_map) { .index = vector, .virq = irq };
> +
> + if (WARN_ON(irq < 0))
> + return;
> +
> + cmd = vfio_pci_memory_lock_and_enable(vdev);
> + pci_msix_free_irq(pdev, map);
> + vfio_pci_memory_unlock_and_restore(vdev, cmd);
> +}
> +
> static int vfio_msi_set_vector_signal(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev,
> unsigned int vector, int fd, bool msix)
> {
> struct pci_dev *pdev = vdev->pdev;
> struct vfio_pci_irq_ctx *ctx;
> struct eventfd_ctx *trigger;
> - int irq, ret;
> + int irq = -EINVAL, ret;
> u16 cmd;
>
> - irq = pci_irq_vector(pdev, vector);
> - if (irq < 0)
> - return -EINVAL;
> -
> ctx = vfio_irq_ctx_get(vdev, vector);
>
> if (ctx) {
> irq_bypass_unregister_producer(&ctx->producer);
> -
> + irq = pci_irq_vector(pdev, vector);
> cmd = vfio_pci_memory_lock_and_enable(vdev);
> free_irq(irq, ctx->trigger);
> vfio_pci_memory_unlock_and_restore(vdev, cmd);
> + /* Interrupt stays allocated, will be freed at MSI-X disable. */
> kfree(ctx->name);
> eventfd_ctx_put(ctx->trigger);
> vfio_irq_ctx_free(vdev, ctx, vector);
> @@ -401,9 +448,17 @@ static int vfio_msi_set_vector_signal(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev,
> if (fd < 0)
> return 0;
>
> + if (irq == -EINVAL) {
> + irq = vfio_msi_alloc_irq(vdev, vector, msix);
> + if (irq < 0)
> + return irq;
> + }
> +
> ctx = vfio_irq_ctx_alloc(vdev, vector);
> - if (!ctx)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> + if (!ctx) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto out_free_irq;
> + }
>
> ctx->name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT, "vfio-msi%s[%d](%s)",
> msix ? "x" : "", vector, pci_name(pdev));
> @@ -456,6 +511,8 @@ static int vfio_msi_set_vector_signal(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev,
> kfree(ctx->name);
> out_free_ctx:
> vfio_irq_ctx_free(vdev, ctx, vector);
> +out_free_irq:
> + vfio_msi_free_irq(vdev, vector, msix);
> return ret;
> }
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists