[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZD8p3+XyvCiq9RJW@x1n>
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2023 19:38:07 -0400
From: Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
To: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
hannes@...xchg.org, mhocko@...e.com, josef@...icpanda.com,
jack@...e.cz, ldufour@...ux.ibm.com, laurent.dufour@...ibm.com,
michel@...pinasse.org, liam.howlett@...cle.com, jglisse@...gle.com,
vbabka@...e.cz, minchan@...gle.com, dave@...olabs.net,
punit.agrawal@...edance.com, lstoakes@...il.com,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...roid.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] mm: do not increment pgfault stats when page
fault handler retries
On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 03:58:26PM -0700, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> Sure. How about replacing my prior "Register both successful and
> failed faults in PGFAULT counters." comment with "To preserve the
> behavior of older kernels, PGFAULT counters record both successful and
> failed faults, as opposed to perf counters which ignore failed cases"
Looks good here, thanks!
--
Peter Xu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists