lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3382819f-4a4-8622-5642-78c03ecfb878@google.com>
Date:   Mon, 17 Apr 2023 21:31:20 -0700 (PDT)
From:   Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
To:     Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
cc:     hughd@...gle.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, willy@...radead.org,
        brauner@...nel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, p.raghav@...sung.com,
        da.gomez@...sung.com, a.manzanares@...sung.com, dave@...olabs.net,
        yosryahmed@...gle.com, keescook@...omium.org,
        patches@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] tmpfs: add the option to disable swap

On Thu, 9 Mar 2023, Luis Chamberlain wrote:

> I'm doing this work as part of future experimentation with tmpfs and the
> page cache, but given a common complaint found about tmpfs is the
> innability to work without the page cache I figured this might be useful
> to others. It turns out it is -- at least Christian Brauner indicates
> systemd uses ramfs for a few use-cases because they don't want to use
> swap and so having this option would let them move over to using tmpfs
> for those small use cases, see systemd-creds(1).

Thanks for your thorough work on tmpfs "noswap": seems well-received
by quite a few others, that's good.

I've just a few comments on later patches (I don't understand why you
went into those little rearrangements at the start of shmem_writepage(),
but they seem harmless so I don't object), but wanted to ask here:

You say "a common complaint about tmpfs is the inability to work without
the page cache".  Ehh?  I don't understand that at all, and have never
heard such a complaint.  It doesn't affect the series itself (oh, Andrew
has copied that text into the first patch), but please illuminate!

Thanks,
Hugh

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ