linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] ata: libata-core: Apply ATI NCQ horkage to ASPEED as well

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 17 Apr 2023 22:24:19 -0700
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:     Patrick McLean <chutzpah@...too.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
        Dave Airlie <airlied@...hat.com>,
        Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ata: libata-core: Apply ATI NCQ horkage to ASPEED as
 well

On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 06:17:20PM -0700, Patrick McLean wrote:
> We have some machines with ASPEED SATA controllers, and are seeing the same NCQ
> issues that ATI controllers (I am not sure if it's a rebranded ATI controller,
> or they both have some faulty implementation). This NCQ breakage is consistent
> across a few different types of drives.
> 
> Instead of maintaining a list of drives that are broken with ASPEED controllers

Are these ASPEED controllers all the same or a wide variety?
Quirking all controllers from the same vendor seems like an overly
broad approach to me.