[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <82673cff-6571-43fc-9b64-3af2c72593c3@kili.mountain>
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2023 08:45:20 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>
To: Wang Zhang <silver_code@...t.edu.cn>
Cc: Peter Korsgaard <peter@...sgaard.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
hust-os-kernel-patches@...glegroups.com, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] i2c: ocores: add missing unwind goto in
`ocores_i2c_probe`
On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 01:38:13PM +0800, Wang Zhang wrote:
> Smatch Warns:
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-ocores.c:701 ocores_i2c_probe() warn:
> missing unwind goto?
>
> The error handling code after the err_clk label should be executed to
> release any resources that were allocated for the clock if a negative
> error code returned after platform_get_irq_optional.
>
> Fix this by changing the direct return to `goto err_clk`.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wang Zhang <silver_code@...t.edu.cn>
> ---
> v2->v3: the first patch had issues. Just do a much simpler fix. No need
> to add the check. clk_disable_unprepare() has checks for error pointer
> and NULL already.
> v1->v2: change `ocores_i2c_of_probe` to use `devm_clk_get_enabled()`
I meant send it to the public mailing list. Don't add the other
comments which are related to discussions on this list. Just say that
the public 1 was buggy and the this new v2 patch is simpler.
regards,
dan carpenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists