linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 0/2] spi: loongson: add bus driver for the loongson spi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 18 Apr 2023 09:06:06 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     zhuyinbo <zhuyinbo@...ngson.cn>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Jianmin Lv <lvjianmin@...ngson.cn>, wanghongliang@...ngson.cn,
        Liu Peibao <liupeibao@...ngson.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/2] spi: loongson: add bus driver for the loongson spi

On 18/04/2023 04:53, zhuyinbo wrote:
> 
> 
> 在 2023/4/15 上午4:43, Krzysztof Kozlowski 写道:
>> On 12/04/2023 06:51, Yinbo Zhu wrote:
>>> Loongson platform support spi hardware controller and this series patch
>>> was to add spi driver and binding support.
>>>
>>> Change in v2:
>>> 		1. This [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings patch need depend on clk patch:
>>> 	 	   https://
>>
>> Can you stop Ccing fake address "loongson-kernel@...ts.loongnix.cn"? It
>> does not exist. Remove it from all submissions.Recently, There was some issue with the company's email server, causing
> this mail list "loongson-kernel@...ts.loongnix.cn" to only accept
> internal emails and not accpet external emails. The company's IT is
> working to fix this issue. and Ccing this mail list is an internal
> requirement.  I will not send emails to this mail list until this email
> sever issue is resolved.

You can always Bcc it, if you have such requirement. However your
internal requirements should not cause my removing all the time multiple
bounces...

Best regards,
Krzysztof