[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230418011720.3900090-3-chutzpah@gentoo.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2023 18:17:20 -0700
From: Patrick McLean <chutzpah@...too.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, Dave Airlie <airlied@...hat.com>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Patrick McLean <chutzpah@...too.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] ata: libata-core: Apply ATI NCQ horkage to ASPEED as well
We have some machines with ASPEED SATA controllers, and are seeing the same NCQ
issues that ATI controllers (I am not sure if it's a rebranded ATI controller,
or they both have some faulty implementation). This NCQ breakage is consistent
across a few different types of drives.
Instead of maintaining a list of drives that are broken with ASPEED controllers
as well as ATI, let's just treat ASPEED controllers like ATI ones, and disable
NCQ on drives that have ATA_HORKAGE_NO_NCQ_ON_ATI set on them.
We have been running this patch on several machines for over a week now without
reproducing an issue that was happening almost daily before.
Signed-off-by: Patrick McLean <chutzpah@...too.org>
---
drivers/ata/libata-core.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-core.c b/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
index 14c17c3bda4e..051492e8e9f9 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
@@ -2219,7 +2219,8 @@ static int ata_dev_config_ncq(struct ata_device *dev,
}
if (dev->horkage & ATA_HORKAGE_NO_NCQ_ON_ATI &&
- ata_dev_check_adapter(dev, PCI_VENDOR_ID_ATI)) {
+ (ata_dev_check_adapter(dev, PCI_VENDOR_ID_ATI) ||
+ ata_dev_check_adapter(dev, PCI_VENDOR_ID_ASPEED))) {
snprintf(desc, desc_sz, "NCQ (not used)");
return 0;
}
--
2.40.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists