lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cb81a63f-72b5-def7-e2de-f74087b87bfb@aspeedtech.com>
Date:   Tue, 18 Apr 2023 15:55:15 +0800
From:   Jammy Huang <jammy_huang@...eedtech.com>
To:     Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>, <airlied@...hat.com>,
        <airlied@...il.com>, <daniel@...ll.ch>
CC:     <giantl@...dia.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/ast: Fix ARM compatibility

Hi Thomas,

Thanks for you reminder. The comment you mentioned is added in 2014 for 
AST2400 rev 0x20, which means MMIO is not enable by default before that 
revision. I will send another patch to handle it.


On 2023/4/18 下午 03:24, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> Hi
>
> Am 18.04.23 um 03:23 schrieb Jammy Huang:
>> Hi Thomas,
>>
>> The Intel(x86) CPUs have a separate address space for "IO", but the 
>> ARM architecture only has "memory", so all IO devices are accessed as 
>> if they were memory. Which means ARM does not support isolated IO. 
>> Here is a related discussion on ARM's forum.
>>
>> https://community.arm.com/support-forums/f/architectures-and-processors-forum/52046/how-to-read-write-an-i-o-port-in-aarch64 
>>
>>
>> Thus, we want to adapt MMIO only after this patch.
>
> What I mean is that there's a comment that says "assume the chip has 
> MMIO enabled by default (rev 0x20 and higher)". We also support revs 
> before 0x20. What happens to them?
>
> Best regards
> Thomas
>
>>
>> On 2023/4/17 下午 07:51, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> Am 07.04.23 um 04:09 schrieb Jammy Huang:
>>>> Hi Thomas,
>>>>
>>>> Could you help review this patch??
>>>>
>>>> We met some problem on nvidia's ARM platfrom and need this patch to 
>>>> fix it.
>>>>
>>>> On 2023/3/2 上午 10:19, Jammy Huang wrote:
>>>>> ARM architecture only has 'memory', so all devices are accessed by 
>>>>> MMIO.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Jammy Huang <jammy_huang@...eedtech.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>   drivers/gpu/drm/ast/ast_main.c | 17 +----------------
>>>>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 16 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ast/ast_main.c 
>>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/ast/ast_main.c
>>>>> index 794ffd4a29c5..f86d01e9f024 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ast/ast_main.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ast/ast_main.c
>>>>> @@ -424,22 +424,7 @@ struct ast_device *ast_device_create(const 
>>>>> struct drm_driver *drv,
>>>>>       if (!ast->regs)
>>>>>           return ERR_PTR(-EIO);
>>>>> -    /*
>>>>> -     * If we don't have IO space at all, use MMIO now and
>>>>> -     * assume the chip has MMIO enabled by default (rev 0x20
>>>>> -     * and higher).
>>>>> -     */
>>>>> -    if (!(pci_resource_flags(pdev, 2) & IORESOURCE_IO)) {
>>>>> -        drm_info(dev, "platform has no IO space, trying MMIO\n");
>>>>> -        ast->ioregs = ast->regs + AST_IO_MM_OFFSET;
>>>>> -    }
>>>>> -
>>>>> -    /* "map" IO regs if the above hasn't done so already */
>>>>> -    if (!ast->ioregs) {
>>>>> -        ast->ioregs = pcim_iomap(pdev, 2, 0);
>>>
>>> What happens on systems that use this branch?
>>>
>>> Best regards
>>> Thomas
>>>
>>>>> -        if (!ast->ioregs)
>>>>> -            return ERR_PTR(-EIO);
>>>>> -    }
>>>>> +    ast->ioregs = ast->regs + AST_IO_MM_OFFSET;
>>>>>       ast_detect_chip(dev, &need_post);
>>>>>
>>>>> base-commit: 254986e324add8a30d0019c6da59f81adc8b565f
>>>>
>>>
>> -- 
>> Best Regards
>> Jammy
>>
>
-- 
Best Regards
Jammy

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ