[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <867cu9lggw.wl-maz@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2023 09:52:47 +0100
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.com>
Cc: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Peter Geis <pgwipeout@...il.com>,
XiaoDong Huang <derrick.huang@...k-chips.com>,
Kever Yang <kever.yang@...k-chips.com>,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...labora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] irqchip/gic-v3: Add Rockchip 3588001 errata workaround
On Mon, 17 Apr 2023 22:40:34 +0100,
Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.com> wrote:
>
> Rockchip RK3588/RK3588s GIC600 integration does not support the
> sharability feature. Rockchip assigned Errata ID #3588001 for this
> issue.
s/Errata/Erratum/ (here and in the subject).
>
> Note, that the 0x0201743b ID is not Rockchip specific and thus
> there is an extra of_machine_is_compatible() check.
>
> The flag are named BROKEN_SHAREABILITY to be vendor agnostic,
Either "the flag is" or "the flags are".
> since apparently similar integration design errors exist in other
> platforms and they can reuse the same flag.
>
> Co-developed-by: XiaoDong Huang <derrick.huang@...k-chips.com>
> Signed-off-by: XiaoDong Huang <derrick.huang@...k-chips.com>
> Co-developed-by: Kever Yang <kever.yang@...k-chips.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kever Yang <kever.yang@...k-chips.com>
> Co-developed-by: Lucas Tanure <lucas.tanure@...labora.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lucas Tanure <lucas.tanure@...labora.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.com>
> ---
> Documentation/arm64/silicon-errata.rst | 3 +++
> arch/arm64/Kconfig | 10 ++++++++
> drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 48 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/arm64/silicon-errata.rst b/Documentation/arm64/silicon-errata.rst
> index ec5f889d7681..46d06ed3e4f4 100644
> --- a/Documentation/arm64/silicon-errata.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/arm64/silicon-errata.rst
> @@ -205,6 +205,9 @@ stable kernels.
> +----------------+-----------------+-----------------+-----------------------------+
> | Qualcomm Tech. | Kryo4xx Gold | N/A | ARM64_ERRATUM_1286807 |
> +----------------+-----------------+-----------------+-----------------------------+
> ++----------------+-----------------+-----------------+-----------------------------+
> +| Rockchip | RK3588 | #3588001 | ROCKCHIP_ERRATUM_3588001 |
> ++----------------+-----------------+-----------------+-----------------------------+
>
> +----------------+-----------------+-----------------+-----------------------------+
> | Fujitsu | A64FX | E#010001 | FUJITSU_ERRATUM_010001 |
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> index 1023e896d46b..1bc43faef10a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> @@ -1150,6 +1150,16 @@ config NVIDIA_CARMEL_CNP_ERRATUM
>
> If unsure, say Y.
>
> +config ROCKCHIP_ERRATUM_3588001
> + bool "Rockchip 3588001: GIC600 can not support shareability attributes"
> + default y
> + help
> + The Rockchip RK3588 GIC600 SoC integration does not support ACE/ACE-lite.
> + This means, that the GIC600 may not use the GIC600 sharability feature
This sentence makes little sense. It is the GIC driver that cannot
make use of the shareability attributes.
> + even though it is supported by the IP itself.
> +
> + If unsure, say Y.
> +
> config SOCIONEXT_SYNQUACER_PREITS
> bool "Socionext Synquacer: Workaround for GICv3 pre-ITS"
> default y
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
> index 586271b8aa39..5b7aa48dde25 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
> @@ -42,9 +42,11 @@
> #define ITS_FLAGS_CMDQ_NEEDS_FLUSHING (1ULL << 0)
> #define ITS_FLAGS_WORKAROUND_CAVIUM_22375 (1ULL << 1)
> #define ITS_FLAGS_WORKAROUND_CAVIUM_23144 (1ULL << 2)
> +#define ITS_FLAGS_BROKEN_SHAREABILITY (1ULL << 3)
Having slept on it, I'd rather this is renamed as
"FORCE_NON_SHAREABLE", as it better describes what we are doing. The
brokenness is an attribute of the platform, not of the flag.
>
> #define RDIST_FLAGS_PROPBASE_NEEDS_FLUSHING (1 << 0)
> #define RDIST_FLAGS_RD_TABLES_PREALLOCATED (1 << 1)
> +#define RDIST_FLAGS_BROKEN_SHAREABILITY (1 << 2)
Same thing here.
Thanks,
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists