linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] usb: phy: phy-tahvo: fix memory leak in tahvo_usb

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2023041832-parakeet-claim-b458@gregkh>
Date:   Tue, 18 Apr 2023 11:19:12 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Li Yang <lidaxian@...t.edu.cn>
Cc:     Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>,
        Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@....ru>,
        Dongliang Mu <dzm91@...t.edu.cn>, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: phy: phy-tahvo: fix memory leak in tahvo_usb_probe()

On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 05:07:57PM +0800, Li Yang wrote:
> Smatch reports:
> drivers/usb/phy/phy-tahvo.c: tahvo_usb_probe()
> warn: missing unwind goto?
> 
> After geting irq, if ret < 0, it will return without error handling to
> free memory.
> Just add error handling to fix this problem.
> 
> Fixes: 0d45a1373e66 ("usb: phy: tahvo: add IRQ check")
> Signed-off-by: Li Yang <lidaxian@...t.edu.cn>
> Reviewed-by: Dongliang Mu <dzm91@...t.edu.cn>
> ---
> The issue is found by static analysis, and the patch remains untest.
> ---
>  drivers/usb/phy/phy-tahvo.c | 7 +++++--
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/phy/phy-tahvo.c b/drivers/usb/phy/phy-tahvo.c
> index f2d2cc586c5b..184a5f3d7473 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/phy/phy-tahvo.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/phy/phy-tahvo.c
> @@ -390,8 +390,11 @@ static int tahvo_usb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	dev_set_drvdata(&pdev->dev, tu);
>  
>  	tu->irq = ret = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> -	if (ret < 0)
> -		return ret;
> +	if (ret < 0) {
> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "could not get irq: %d\n",
> +				ret);

Why print this out?  And why the odd line-wrapping?

thanks,

greg k-h